PWE vs. XOM: Followup

A few days ago I wrote Jake Schmidt about what I saw was the problem with the large integrated oil companies like Exxon (XOM), Conoco (COP) and Chevron (CVX). Namely, the integrated oils are saddled with both diminishing reserves in more politically dangerous and expensive locations, and alternately, generate much of their income from refining and retail operations which have been squeezed by tight crude supplies and decreasing crack spreads.

This week's earning news has backed up that assertion as XOM on Thursday and CVX today, have disappointed the Street and have been sold off as a result. I had suggested that instead, we should just buy more Pennwest (PWE) or other favorite Canroys. They continue to be a great bargain as shown by the yield and cash flow multiples. Or, if a little more leverage and return is desired, sell the puts short.

Today (August 1), the PWE September $30 put (PWEUF) has a premium of $1.65. This generates a return of over 5% on the premium, but with the leverage of a margined short put (20% margin), the actual return is over 25%. When the 42 days to expiration is annualized, that simple return is around 250%. High return, high risk, so what is the risk? Getting PWE assigned at $30 a share if the price drops further before expiration on September 20. That PWE stock price is based on the cash flow generated by an average crude oil price of $80 a barrel, with the PWE hedge program that is in place. What is the risk of oil going below $80 in the next 12 or 24 months? I think pretty low. And if the stock is "put" to you the option seller, it is returning 12% on dividend yield right now, while retaining almost 50% of its cash flow for reinvestment and acquisition.

I continue to think the Canroys are the way to play the energy market. If not PWE, take a look at Daylight (DAYYF), Harvest Energy (HTE), Provident (PVX), Baytex (BTE), or Pengrowth (PGH).

Intel Showing the Way Up

It has been a few days since I have posted my market moves. Thought I would update you today, April 16.

The market opened strong this morning based on the decent Intel quarterly report after the close last night. Tech is a market lynchpin. There has been a school of thought that Tech can't do well if Financials are hurting, since the banking industry is a heavy consumer of computing, software and data storage. But the Intel quarter disproves that theory.

At the same time, the banks continue to do what is necessary to reposition themselves for a less ebullient economy. I think most market participants are coming to the conclusion that the worst is past, though it may take quite a while for bank growth to get back to where it was in 2006. But a more conservative banking industry is okay by most participants.

Also, more educated observers, including Jack Welch, ex-CEO of GE, this morning. are talking about the great benefits to profits of reversing the mark-to-market of the bank assets. It is likely they have mostly been over-discounted. Those assets will be a source of profits for years to come. Expect savvy bank execs to use those assets to "beat the estimate" for the next several years, which will drive P/Es up on banks.

Here are my moves today: bought more Daylight Energy (DAYYF) for my IRA account, added to FXI, the China index, added to DOW Chemical (DOW).

I am still sitting on my AEM (Agnico Eagle) gold mining shorts. Today it is at $75, so I am in the red on this. But I have more than the same number of AEM May Puts shorted at $65 which just about covers my losses on the stock shorts. I will continue paying for the stock shorts with the close month put shorts, basically averaging up my cost. I am using the AEM shorts to protect my several precious metal mutual fund positions, since this commodity bubble will likely correct significantly as soon as the market believes the bottom is in for the stock market, and that the Fed will start raising rates as the economy begins to improve.

When it does correct, history shows that commodities correct very quickly and aggressively since so much hot money is chasing such a little base of equity.

As for the price of oil: I am just glad I am loaded up on energy stocks, which eases the pain at the pump. The Canroys are finally starting to move. The can go a long way from here in playing catch up to their USA equals. If oil and gas prices hold, I think $40 on PWE is a good possibility in the next 2-3 months and $25 on PGH.

Hope you have a great day in the market.

The Trouble with Canroys

Brian, I have one question that keeps coming up on all the boards about CANROYS. The comments are that since the CANROYS pay out such a large dividend, and if they are not able to increase their production capabilites that the stocks will reduce in price over time as all the dividends are paid out. (or something close to this). Do they have a point or is this true for all oil and gas companies.

Jake, It is true that Canroys (and REITS and Master limited partnerships or MLPs in the States) are valued based on their dividend payout which is closely related to cash flow. In the States, REITs and MLPs must pay out 95% of income by law. In Canada, it is left to the royalty trust what percent to pay out.

This is an important distinction in my mind. The additional flexibility in Canada allows the Canroys to use a larger percent of income to make acquisitions to replace or expand production. You will see this is happening with the better trusts we invest in when you read the quarterly and annual reports of the trusts. PWE reinvests about 40% of its income in production, either making acquisitions (like the recent C1 Energy acquisition) or investing in additional wells on existing leases or rehabbing old wells. American trusts (MLPs and REITs) do have a problem with reinvesting in production and must issue more shares (diluting current owners) to raise money for acquisitions or expansions.

The metric that is used to measure how likely Canroys are to keep producing is Reserve Life. I look for a reserve life of at least 10 years. This doesn't mean the trust becomes worthless in 10 years, but that is how much "proven reserves" are available to last at current production rates. Each trust also has "probable reserves" which are normally many times the proven reserves. Probables are on leases that have yet to be tested, but are known to have oil and/or gas. So, as long as the trust doesn't run out of oil / gas, it will continue to produce and pay dividends.

The only other thing that can go wrong is a collapse in the price of oil and gas. Most of the trusts have a business model that generates current dividends well below current prices. (PWE's dividend model is around $40 a barrel). If the price of energy goes below that level, then profitability declines and they may start "shutting in" wells to eliminate marginally profitable pumping. But I am betting againsts that happening anytime soon. It would require a lengthy global recession to significantly reduce global energy demand.

So, in short, if we stick with the big trusts like PWE or PGH, I don't think there is much to worry about. If the trusts are acquired by a private company, then we will get a nice one time appreciation, but will lose the long term dividend. So, I am hoping the trusts remain independent and the Canadian gov't backs off on the tax change.